A24 to Release New Holmes Documentary in October

A24 will theatrically release a documentary following Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes in October. It is titled “You Can See Everything.” It was directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim. According to reporting by staff@engadget.com (Karissa Bell) of Engadget, the trailer’s eerie atmosphere is drawing attention.

The film was shot in 2023. It documents the few days just before Holmes was imprisoned. She was sentenced to 11 years for defrauding Theranos investors. The subject has already been covered by two documentaries and a Hulu series. Even so, its content seems likely to attract renewed interest.

Three-Hour Record Filmed Just Before Imprisonment

It was filmed in 2023. It was just before Holmes was imprisoned to serve her sentence. The runtime extends to three hours. It is structured around extended interviews.

The New York Times reported on how the production came about. Holmes reportedly gave extensive interviews aimed at rehabilitating her reputation. It is a project strongly reflecting her own intentions. There is an aspect of using the filming as a forum for vindication.

Theranos was a startup that claimed it would transform medicine through blood testing. A gap between the actual technology and its claims later came to light. Fraud against investors was established, and criminal liability was finalized. This film serves as a sequel capturing the immediate aftermath of that collapse.

Fielder and Oppenheim’s Aims

The film has two directors. Fielder is known as a comedian. He also features prominently in the trailer. The structure puts him front and center as an interlocutor.

The collaboration with Oppenheim is also distinctive. The unusual pairing drew attention even before production. It combines reenactment techniques with extended dialogue. It has a different texture from conventional true-crime documentaries.

Advances in technology for video reenactment and reconstruction have been remarkable. Streaming 3D Reconstruction Achieves SOTA with Geometric Context Transformer demonstrates a method for reconstructing 3D structure from continuous video with high accuracy. It is an area relevant to the persuasiveness of reenactments in documentaries. The level of reenactment in this film will also be worth watching.

Unsettling Dialogue and Reenactment in the Trailer

The trailer released by A24 reveals little. Even so, the tension in the dialogue is clear. There is a scene in which she stares directly into Fielder’s eyes. Holmes speaks to him from close range.

Her remarks are quoted in the original as follows.

“Why would I deceive you”

She then continues with the following words.

“There’s no reason for me to do that”

The footage is composed in near-staring framings. It is hard to tell whether it is vindication or persuasion. The sense of unease is deliberately emphasized.

The New York Times says it includes innovative reenactments. It reportedly intercuts dialogue scenes with reenacted scenes. There is another exchange drawing attention. It is a scene in which Holmes and her partner discuss a new business.

“to launch a new and improved Theranos”

She reportedly mentioned plans for an improved version of Theranos. If true, it is not a detail to be taken lightly. Verification work will be needed after its release.

The processes of video encoding and distribution also affect the impression of a work. Vulkan Video Encode Returns on Intel Alchemist GPUs reports on moves to support encoding on already-released hardware. For distribution after theatrical release, compression quality will be questioned. Reception of this film may also differ between theaters and streaming.

Holmes’s Own Messaging and the Theatrical Release

Holmes herself has shown a positive attitude toward the film. She shared the trailer herself on X. She has stepped up her posting activity over the past year. She is said to be posting with the help of a proxy.

Her explanation is quoted in the original as follows.

“mostly my words”

She positioned the trailer as centered on her own words. She also added the following brief words.

“I’m always being real”

It amounted to a claim that she is always being genuine. She is seen as having viewed it more favorably than past portrayals. Her remarks suggest closeness with the filmmakers.

It will be released theatrically. It is scheduled for sometime in October. Distribution and streaming plans are currently unclear. Past works spread through outlets such as the Hulu series. For this film too, the focus will be on streaming rights.

Screening and distribution testing systems are also drawing interest. GNOME OS Test Center, Inspired by Apple TestFlight reports on an effort to establish pre-distribution verification. For films as well, quality checks before release are important. Flaws in sound or subtitles impair reception.

In the Context of Examining Startup Mythology

The Theranos case is an emblematic example for startups. It claimed that many tests could be performed with a single drop of blood. It raised funds and attracted talent by pledging to transform healthcare. The lack of technological backing proved fatal.

The lesson for engineers and investors is clear. Empirical evidence and independent verification matter. It showed the danger of letting a founder’s story run ahead. Failures of governance and disclosure were also called into question.

This film has the character of a recorded vindication. The tension with the filmmakers’ critical perspective is at its core. The focus is on the relationship between the subject’s intentions and editorial independence. Viewers will need to verify the facts.

Editorial Opinion

Looking at the short-term impact. After the theatrical release in October, competition to acquire streaming rights will intensify. The audience from the past series will flow back in, and plays of related works will grow. Clips of her own posts on X will spread out of context, increasing the burden of fact-checking.

From a long-term perspective, we assess it will become teaching material for credibility checks on startups. It will be referenced as a case that visualizes the gap between a founder’s narrative and supporting evidence. We also assess that the structure in which a documentary becomes a forum for vindication will spark debate. It will influence the development of standards for production ethics.

We present questions from the editorial team. It is asked whether active involvement by the subject increases transparency or is exploited for staging. It is also asked whether innovative reenactments aid understanding or manipulate impressions. It is asked how viewers should separate the appeal of the story from the weight of the facts.

References

• “A new Elizabeth Holmes documentary from Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim is coming from A24”, by staff@engadget.com (Karissa Bell) — Engadget, 2026-09-07T22:45:02.000Z (ARR)
• Source URL: https://www.engadget.com/2252334/new-elizabeth-holmes-documentary-nathan-fielder-and-lance-oppenheim-coming-from-a24/